<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tenders Direct Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk</link>
	<description>Comment from the experts at Tenders Direct.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:11:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to score with PQQs by Diane Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/01/20/how-to-score-with-pqqs/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diane Callaghan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=251#comment-1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your message.

We appreciate growing your business in the current market can be difficult.  However, the public sector have to keep buying, so it is a good market to get into.  Also, there are some tenders which evaluate suppliers based on MEAT (Most Economically Advantageous Tender) rather than the lowest price – which might put some weight on your customer service focus. 

You can find out about painting and decorating contracts through a subscription to Tenders Direct – to see tenders for this type of requirement please follow this link - http://www.tendersdirect.co.uk/Search/Categories/Category_Results.aspx?id=P058&amp;cat=15.  

We also offer training and consultancy services, which you can find out more about here - http://www.tendersdirect.co.uk/Training/Courses.aspx.  If you need any further information about content or costs please feel free to contact our training team on 0844 561 0675 or training@millstream.eu.  As a Scottish business you may be entitled to funding to assist with the cost of course(s), for more information see - http://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/flexible-training.aspx.  

There is also an online government course called Winning the Contract (http://www1.learndirect-business.com/growing-and-developing-your-business/winning-the-contract/#) which might help.    

If we can provide any further assistance please don’t hesitate to contact us on 0800 270 0249.  

Good luck with your tendering!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your message.</p>
<p>We appreciate growing your business in the current market can be difficult.  However, the public sector have to keep buying, so it is a good market to get into.  Also, there are some tenders which evaluate suppliers based on MEAT (Most Economically Advantageous Tender) rather than the lowest price – which might put some weight on your customer service focus. </p>
<p>You can find out about painting and decorating contracts through a subscription to Tenders Direct – to see tenders for this type of requirement please follow this link &#8211; <a href="http://www.tendersdirect.co.uk/Search/Categories/Category_Results.aspx?id=P058&#038;cat=15" rel="nofollow">http://www.tendersdirect.co.uk/Search/Categories/Category_Results.aspx?id=P058&#038;cat=15</a>.  </p>
<p>We also offer training and consultancy services, which you can find out more about here &#8211; <a href="http://www.tendersdirect.co.uk/Training/Courses.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.tendersdirect.co.uk/Training/Courses.aspx</a>.  If you need any further information about content or costs please feel free to contact our training team on 0844 561 0675 or <a href="mailto:training@millstream.eu">training@millstream.eu</a>.  As a Scottish business you may be entitled to funding to assist with the cost of course(s), for more information see &#8211; <a href="http://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/flexible-training.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.skillsdevelopmentscotland.co.uk/flexible-training.aspx</a>.  </p>
<p>There is also an online government course called Winning the Contract (<a href="http://www1.learndirect-business.com/growing-and-developing-your-business/winning-the-contract/#" rel="nofollow">http://www1.learndirect-business.com/growing-and-developing-your-business/winning-the-contract/#</a>) which might help.    </p>
<p>If we can provide any further assistance please don’t hesitate to contact us on 0800 270 0249.  </p>
<p>Good luck with your tendering!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to score with PQQs by Kevin Park</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/01/20/how-to-score-with-pqqs/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Park]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=251#comment-1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a small business where i have a very successful team of decorators who are dedicated to giving the customer the best quality of service every time. We would love to train our team further and gain more experience but in our trade proffit is not on our side as other decorators are under cutting our prices and not giving the same level of service which leaves us struggling to make proffit to progess ourselves. Although we are never out of work because of repeat custom and word of mouth it makes it difficult to move on to bigger and better things, instead we keep our heads up and try to keep our prices as close as possible to our competitors to win new contacts and gain a larger client base. I am trying to seek larger opportunities for us but as i am better with my tools than i am with computers etc it seems like we are stuck until we can afford to gain the training we require as advertising, fuel costs, insurance, accountancy fees etc eat all our money up. Any advice would be much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a small business where i have a very successful team of decorators who are dedicated to giving the customer the best quality of service every time. We would love to train our team further and gain more experience but in our trade proffit is not on our side as other decorators are under cutting our prices and not giving the same level of service which leaves us struggling to make proffit to progess ourselves. Although we are never out of work because of repeat custom and word of mouth it makes it difficult to move on to bigger and better things, instead we keep our heads up and try to keep our prices as close as possible to our competitors to win new contacts and gain a larger client base. I am trying to seek larger opportunities for us but as i am better with my tools than i am with computers etc it seems like we are stuck until we can afford to gain the training we require as advertising, fuel costs, insurance, accountancy fees etc eat all our money up. Any advice would be much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corruption claims against Edinburgh City Council by Richard Venters</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2011/09/20/corruption-claims-against-edinburgh-city-council/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Venters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=761#comment-1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My experience with Edinburgh Council corruption goes from the root to the top of the tree. I was flooded out by a cannabis farm in December 2010 and have fought tooth and nail with the HMO and the Environmental Team to charge the Landlord with repairs to his property which was above my home. His property had been condemned, but that did not stop this landlord from having multiple occupants staying there. The Electricity alone was not earthed in the property,so endangered life to a further seven homes within that block. A year has passed and several phone calls and e-mails later have fallen on deaf ears. The Environmental Team had placed statutory notices on the property and this was seen to be successful  when the landlord phoned and told the head of operation&#039;s that the work had been completed two months after the flood. Yes you guessed it no other investigation took place. During the last year the overcrowding in the condemned flat.was reported by other tenants as well as myself reporting it to the head of HMO and nobody ever appeared to investigate this. We tried to get in touch with the landlord but he would hang up on us, the way around this was to contact the HMO.and the landlord would turn up within the hour and shift his tenants to another flat for a week or more. I for one cant sleep at night as this landlord has many properties of similar standards of which he pays his fees to the council,and it would seem this is enough in payment to endanger life.

And yes repairs on the Landlords property were never carried out,its all in the phone call to the right person it would appear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with Edinburgh Council corruption goes from the root to the top of the tree. I was flooded out by a cannabis farm in December 2010 and have fought tooth and nail with the HMO and the Environmental Team to charge the Landlord with repairs to his property which was above my home. His property had been condemned, but that did not stop this landlord from having multiple occupants staying there. The Electricity alone was not earthed in the property,so endangered life to a further seven homes within that block. A year has passed and several phone calls and e-mails later have fallen on deaf ears. The Environmental Team had placed statutory notices on the property and this was seen to be successful  when the landlord phoned and told the head of operation&#8217;s that the work had been completed two months after the flood. Yes you guessed it no other investigation took place. During the last year the overcrowding in the condemned flat.was reported by other tenants as well as myself reporting it to the head of HMO and nobody ever appeared to investigate this. We tried to get in touch with the landlord but he would hang up on us, the way around this was to contact the HMO.and the landlord would turn up within the hour and shift his tenants to another flat for a week or more. I for one cant sleep at night as this landlord has many properties of similar standards of which he pays his fees to the council,and it would seem this is enough in payment to endanger life.</p>
<p>And yes repairs on the Landlords property were never carried out,its all in the phone call to the right person it would appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answering your Questions on Framework Agreements by Tim Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/05/27/answering-your-questions-on-framework-agreements/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=332#comment-1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Robert,

Yes it would be in breach of the regulations. The framework agreement allows you to simplify the arrangements for multiple contracts for similar goods or services, by awarding the master agreement (the framework) and then awarding call-off&#039;s based on the terms and conditions in that agreement.

The value of all contracts for similar goods and services awarded during the financial year must be aggregated and it is the aggregate value that determines whether the contract is over the OJEU threshold. That is, the value of the individual contracts has no relevance, so even a £10,000 contract should be awarded through a framework, or advertised separately in the OJEU, if the aggregate value of all similar contracts takes it over the relevant threshold.

There&#039;s nothing to stop you running a separate tender exercise for a £50k contract, but you couldn&#039;t just directly award the contract, it would have to go through the OJEU process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>Yes it would be in breach of the regulations. The framework agreement allows you to simplify the arrangements for multiple contracts for similar goods or services, by awarding the master agreement (the framework) and then awarding call-off&#8217;s based on the terms and conditions in that agreement.</p>
<p>The value of all contracts for similar goods and services awarded during the financial year must be aggregated and it is the aggregate value that determines whether the contract is over the OJEU threshold. That is, the value of the individual contracts has no relevance, so even a £10,000 contract should be awarded through a framework, or advertised separately in the OJEU, if the aggregate value of all similar contracts takes it over the relevant threshold.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing to stop you running a separate tender exercise for a £50k contract, but you couldn&#8217;t just directly award the contract, it would have to go through the OJEU process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answering your Questions on Framework Agreements by Robert Smyth</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/05/27/answering-your-questions-on-framework-agreements/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Smyth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=332#comment-1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi gents

Would a multi-provider framework agreement with a combination of call off methods i.e. direct award for contracts up to say £50k and the re-opening of mini-competition over that £50k threshold be in breach of the regulations/directives?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi gents</p>
<p>Would a multi-provider framework agreement with a combination of call off methods i.e. direct award for contracts up to say £50k and the re-opening of mini-competition over that £50k threshold be in breach of the regulations/directives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome by Brian D'Mello</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2009/08/26/hello-world/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian D'Mello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I visit the Tenders Direct Blog from time to time and find it very informative.

Information I have been searching for is the numbers of cases going to UK courts particularly those at the lower end of the EU thresholds. I am not only looking for numbers of cases being heard but also those waiting to be heard.

Not sure if it&#039;s there or something worth considering on the blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I visit the Tenders Direct Blog from time to time and find it very informative.</p>
<p>Information I have been searching for is the numbers of cases going to UK courts particularly those at the lower end of the EU thresholds. I am not only looking for numbers of cases being heard but also those waiting to be heard.</p>
<p>Not sure if it&#8217;s there or something worth considering on the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New research: UK deficit can be slashed without cuts to public services by London cleaning services</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2011/10/04/new-research-uk-deficit-can-be-slashed-without-cuts-to-public-services/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[London cleaning services]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=776#comment-996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The danger of premature action to reduce budget deficits while we are still recovering from the recession has been well aired internationally in the G20 group. The UK government, however, still seems more worried about maintaining confidence in financial markets than reducing unemployment – despite the fact that no one would seriously expect the UK to default on its public debt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The danger of premature action to reduce budget deficits while we are still recovering from the recession has been well aired internationally in the G20 group. The UK government, however, still seems more worried about maintaining confidence in financial markets than reducing unemployment – despite the fact that no one would seriously expect the UK to default on its public debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answering your Questions on Framework Agreements by Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/05/27/answering-your-questions-on-framework-agreements/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=332#comment-987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim

I wonder if you could help. I understand that a framework can not be used if the effect is to restrict, prevent or distort competition.

A framework we are examining makes use of a Most Favoured Customer clause which prevents any suppliers on the framework from offering better pricing to any other party. In our view this has the effect of reducing and distorting competition because, in effect, it sets a price floor below which these suppliers may not operate, even if they wish to.

Additionally, we believe that the presence of the clause creates a monopolistic position for the framework operator who are a private company acting as agent for a government department. They earn significant fees from each transaction and have created a position wit their framework where it has become impossible for any other procuring organisation to compete. This alone, we believe, is a distortion of the market, restricting competition.

I would welcome your thoughts on whether the presence of the MVC clause restricts, prevents or distorts competition in contravention of the EU regulations.

Thank you

Michael]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim</p>
<p>I wonder if you could help. I understand that a framework can not be used if the effect is to restrict, prevent or distort competition.</p>
<p>A framework we are examining makes use of a Most Favoured Customer clause which prevents any suppliers on the framework from offering better pricing to any other party. In our view this has the effect of reducing and distorting competition because, in effect, it sets a price floor below which these suppliers may not operate, even if they wish to.</p>
<p>Additionally, we believe that the presence of the clause creates a monopolistic position for the framework operator who are a private company acting as agent for a government department. They earn significant fees from each transaction and have created a position wit their framework where it has become impossible for any other procuring organisation to compete. This alone, we believe, is a distortion of the market, restricting competition.</p>
<p>I would welcome your thoughts on whether the presence of the MVC clause restricts, prevents or distorts competition in contravention of the EU regulations.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answering your Questions on Framework Agreements by Tim Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/05/27/answering-your-questions-on-framework-agreements/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=332#comment-982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan,

Thanks for your questions, the situation is the same under the UK regulations and the Scottish regulations so I&#039;ll answer them both here.

Firstly, regarding the process, if it&#039;s a multi-supplier framework the process will depend on the type of award procedure that was used to put the framework agreement in place. If it was an Open or a Restricted procedure then the utility can choose a supplier based on the original bids, or conduct a mini-competition. The option of using the negotiated procedure is also always available, which may provide more flexibility.

If the utility is selecting a supplier based on the original bids then there is no requirement to notify all the framework suppliers that they are doing so, although in terms of transparency and future competitiveness there may be advantages in doing so. In the situation where you are conducting a mini-competition or using the negotiated procedure it is clearly sensible to notify all of the framework suppliers that you are doing so in order to obtain a competitive response.

Moving on to the award stage, a utility is not required to publish a contract award notice in the Official Journal (OJEU) where it awards a contract under a framework agreement. Although again it might be considered good practice and improve competition for the future if at least the other framework suppliers are notified.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>Thanks for your questions, the situation is the same under the UK regulations and the Scottish regulations so I&#8217;ll answer them both here.</p>
<p>Firstly, regarding the process, if it&#8217;s a multi-supplier framework the process will depend on the type of award procedure that was used to put the framework agreement in place. If it was an Open or a Restricted procedure then the utility can choose a supplier based on the original bids, or conduct a mini-competition. The option of using the negotiated procedure is also always available, which may provide more flexibility.</p>
<p>If the utility is selecting a supplier based on the original bids then there is no requirement to notify all the framework suppliers that they are doing so, although in terms of transparency and future competitiveness there may be advantages in doing so. In the situation where you are conducting a mini-competition or using the negotiated procedure it is clearly sensible to notify all of the framework suppliers that you are doing so in order to obtain a competitive response.</p>
<p>Moving on to the award stage, a utility is not required to publish a contract award notice in the Official Journal (OJEU) where it awards a contract under a framework agreement. Although again it might be considered good practice and improve competition for the future if at least the other framework suppliers are notified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answering your Questions on Framework Agreements by Alan</title>
		<link>http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/2010/05/27/answering-your-questions-on-framework-agreements/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tendersdirect.co.uk/?p=332#comment-980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When making a Direct Award under a multi-supplier framework covered by the Utilities Contracts (Scotland) Regulations do the other suppliers need to be notified of the process and the award?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When making a Direct Award under a multi-supplier framework covered by the Utilities Contracts (Scotland) Regulations do the other suppliers need to be notified of the process and the award?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
